Skip to content
Setout.
Menu

Writing

Notes on the contracts.

Patterns that decide whether a claim, a programme or a final account survives. Real clause references, anonymised numbers. Longer answers than the Contract Assistant gives.

What these notes are about

Most money lost on a construction contract is not lost on site. It is lost in the paperwork that follows the site: a notice sent late, a programme never accepted, a variation agreed in a meeting and never instructed. These notes deal with those failures, one contract mechanism at a time, with the clause references and the sequence that keeps a claim alive.

They are written from the contractor’s and the contract administrator’s side of the table, for the people who prepare and respond to notices, quotations and payment applications. Numbers are anonymised; the patterns are real and repeat across projects.

Three patterns that recur

  • The late or incomplete notice. NEC3 shuts the door on many compensation events after eight weeks, and an event notified without saying which clause it falls under is easy to reject. See why most NEC3 compensation events get rejected.
  • The programme treated as a formality. Under NEC3 the Accepted Programme is the baseline for assessing delay. A bar chart submitted once and never updated gives the contractor nothing to measure from. See what contractors get wrong about NEC3 programmes.
  • The variation nobody wrote down. On JBCC work, verbal instructions and missed deadlines turn into a final account fight months later. See the JBCC final account mistake.

Using the notes

Read them before the problem, not during it. The fixes are habits that have to be in place from the start of a contract: a notice register, a programme submitted and revised properly, every instruction in writing. For a quick answer to a specific question, the Contract Assistant is faster; for the documents themselves, the template packs give you notices and records that cite the right clauses.