A practical comparison of the two dominant SA construction contracts: where each is used, JBCC's traditional model vs NEC3's programme-driven collaboration, and how change and payment are handled.
If you work in South African construction, sooner or later you'll administer both of these. They come from very different traditions, and treating an NEC3 contract like a JBCC one (or the reverse) is where contractors lose money. Here's a practical breakdown from the contract-administration side of the desk.
What each one is
JBCC is the suite published by the Joint Building Contracts Committee, a South African non-profit representing employers, professional consultants, and contractors. The Principal Building Agreement (PBA) — currently Edition 6.2 — is the most widely used standard building contract in the country. It is home-grown, written for local building work, and cidb-endorsed for public-sector use.
NEC3 is the third edition of the New Engineering Contract, developed by the UK's Institution of Civil Engineers. The Engineering and Construction Contract (ECC) is its main works contract. It's cidb-endorsed and used across many countries; NEC4 exists, but NEC3 remains common on South African projects. (Terminology differs between editions — NEC3 refers to "Works Information", NEC4 to "Scope".)
Where each is typically used in SA
JBCC dominates private building work — commercial, retail, residential, and institutional buildings where an architect leads the professional team. NEC3 is the go-to for engineering and infrastructure: power, water, roads, rail, and heavy civils, and it's common on public-sector and state-owned-entity projects. Eskom, for example, procures works under NEC forms, and NEC is often specified on donor- or development-finance-funded infrastructure for its collaborative, programme-driven approach.
The philosophical difference
This is the crux. JBCC follows the traditional building-contract model: the design is done, the principal agent administers the contract, the contractor builds, and claims for time and money are dealt with reactively when events occur. It's familiar, procedural, and well-tested in our courts.
NEC3 is built around proactive, collaborative management — the parties act "in a spirit of mutual trust and co-operation". Three mechanisms drive it:
- The Accepted Programme — a live, contractually binding programme the contractor keeps updated and the Project Manager accepts. Time impacts are assessed against it, so it's the engine of the contract, not a formality.
- Early warning — either party must notify the other as soon as they become aware of anything that could raise cost, delay Completion or a Key Date, or impair performance. Missing an early warning can reduce what you eventually recover.
- Compensation events — the single route for adjusting the Prices and/or the Completion Date.
How change and claims are handled
Under JBCC, change comes through contract instructions and variations issued by the principal agent, and through the contractor's claims for a revision of the date for practical completion where a listed cause beyond the contractor's control applies. Notice is required — fail to give it and you can forfeit the claim.
Under NEC3 there are no "variations" or "claims" as such — everything that changes cost or time is a compensation event drawn from the closed list in clause 60.1. The contractor notifies the event and submits a quotation covering both cost and time. NEC3 carries a well-known time bar: a compensation event must generally be notified within eight weeks of the contractor becoming aware of it, or entitlement is lost. Assessment is prospective — based on a forecast of the effect — not a back-calculation after the fact.
Payment and programme
JBCC works on interim payment certificates: the contractor claims, the quantity surveyor values, and the principal agent certifies at intervals up to the final certificate. Completion is marked by the certificate of practical completion, after which delay damages can run from the intended or revised date. NEC3 pays on the Price for Work Done to Date, assessed by the Project Manager, with the basis depending on the main Option chosen (a priced activity schedule under Option A, or Defined Cost plus Fee under the cost-based/target Options). The Accepted Programme is central throughout.
Practical guidance
If you're on JBCC: know your notice provisions cold, watch the timelines for claiming a revision of the date for practical completion, and keep your delay records tight. If you're on NEC3: administration discipline is everything. Keep the Accepted Programme genuinely current, raise early warnings promptly even when they feel premature, and notify compensation events well inside the eight-week window. The contract rewards contractors who manage actively and penalises those who wait to argue at the end — JBCC forgives a slower administrator more than NEC3 does.
By Setout. General guidance, not project-specific advice.
The Setout list
More guides like this, by email
Occasional email when we publish a new guide or tool. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.